|
President George W. Bush's fiscal year (FY) 2006
budget punishes America's working families for his own misdeeds—his
stubborn insistence on preserving and expanding tax breaks that mostly
benefit America's wealthiest families. Unless checked by the U.S.
Congress, the result of the president's misplaced priorities and
irresponsible and unfair policies will produce enormous suffering for
the most vulnerable of our citizens.
America's working families already are struggling to
maintain living standards in a labor market that has not fully recovered
from the last recession.
 |
There are still not enough jobs to meet the needs
of America's workers. Employers are not adding enough jobs to
significantly cut unemployment, lure discouraged workers back into
the labor force and keep up with population growth. Though overall
employment has just regained pre-recession levels, we still have
more than 700,000 fewer jobs in the private sector than when the
recession began.
 |
Job quality has declined. Wages have not grown for
three years. We lost nearly 3 million manufacturing jobs in the past
four years alone, and last month, manufacturers shed another 25,000
jobs even as factory output increased.
 |
Health care is eroding. The number of uninsured
Americans has grown each year since 2000, while the number with
job-based health coverage has fallen and workers' contributions to
health care premiums, especially for family coverage, have
skyrocketed. Today, 45 million Americans are uninsured; most are in
working families.
 |
Guaranteed pensions are on the endangered list.
Fewer than half of today's workers have job-based pensions. One in
four workers with access to 401(k) savings plans does not
participate in them, and only a tiny sliver of individuals in these
plans—around five percent—makes the maximum allowable
contribution. Savings in 401(k) or IRA plans are less than $10,000
for roughly half of the households nearing retirement. |
| | |
Instead of proposing a budget that will create and
retain good jobs, make health care more affordable and build secure
retirements, Bush wants Congress to make deep cuts in programs all
Americans rely on and that provide an indispensable backstop of economic
and health security for vulnerable children and seniors, the disabled
and the poor. Rather than solving problems for America's workers and
their families, the Bush budget makes these problems worse, further
threatening economic security for families:
 |
The Bush budget gives a cold shoulder to Americans
worried about trade and the ongoing loss of good jobs. In real
dollars, Bush wants to cut trade enforcement by roughly 5 percent
($7 million) over last year's funding. And even though China engages
in egregious trade violations that, in recent years, contributed to
the loss of nearly half-a-million job opportunities for America's
workers, Bush also wants to eliminate a China-specific trade
enforcement and compliance program that Congress has mandated twice.
In addition, despite the loss of millions of factory jobs, Bush
proposes a 60 percent funding cut for the Manufacturing Extension
Partnership, a nationwide program with a proven track record in
helping manufacturers modernize, increase productivity and create
and retain jobs.
 |
Bush's budget will pit workers needing assistance
against each other. Altogether, the Bush budget calls for more than
$550 million in real dollar cuts in the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
and the Employment Service (ES) programs from 2005 funding levels.
Since taking office, Bush has asked Congress to slash nearly $2
billion in real dollars from WIA and ES programs. Bush also wants to
cut the Trade Adjustment Assistance program that retrains laid-off
workers, even as American corporations continue to export jobs
overseas, and to eliminate the Employment Service, a program whose
sole mission is to match the jobless with jobs. Unemployed workers
and poor kids should not be in competition with each other. |
|
Bush's budget does nothing to restore eroding health
care benefits for working families. Despite soaring health care costs
for employers and workers alike and huge increases in states' Medicaid
spending, the Bush budget does nothing to shore up employer-based health
care, which serves roughly two-thirds of insured Americans, or to ease
Medicaid burdens for the states. Instead, Bush wants to expand Health
Savings Accounts, increasing workers' out-of-pocket health care costs,
and to institute new health care tax credits, inducing even more
employers to scale back coverage. Bush also calls for slashing Medicaid
funding for states by $45 billion, imposing enormous new burdens, just
as states are finally digging out of deep budget holes, and threatening
health care for many, including poor seniors and the children of low
wage workers. And under the Bush budget, veterans' health care funding
will be more than 16 percent lower in 2010 than it is today.
 |
Retirement "insecurity" takes center
stage in the Bush budget. In addition to pushing for Social Security
changes that are radical, risky and expensive, Bush's pension
funding proposals penalize workers for their employers' underfunding
of pension plans. Bush wants to cut federal pension guarantees,
outlaw benefits that protect workers in the event of a plant
shutdown and restrict the benefits workers earn at companies with
financial difficulties. In addition, the Bush proposals jeopardize
the entire defined benefit pension system by diverting $12 billion
that could be used to fund pensions at financially weak companies
into sharply higher premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guarantee
Corporation and imposing conditions that likely will drive many
healthy companies away from providing defined benefit pensions at
all.
 |
Children lose big under the Bush budget. The
president proposes to slash more than a half billion dollars in
Education Department funding and to eliminate 48 department
programs, one-third of the total number of programs he wants to end.
Proposed cuts in child care funding would eliminate assistance for
300,000 children by 2009. And cuts in the food stamp program would
end aid for as many as 300,000 individuals, most of whom are in
low-income working families with children. |
|
President Bush and his administration rationalize this
tough love approach to the budget as essential fiscal discipline
designed to achieve deficit reduction. But in truth, the president's
budget is more an exercise in fiscal fiction than in honest and
disciplined fiscal stewardship. At the very moment Bush asks working
families to make health care, education, retirement security and job
training sacrifices, he willfully refuses to "discipline" the
single largest culprit in our budget crisis—his millionaire tax
cuts—and he willingly seeks to swell the nation's debt more, with
proposals to extend tax cuts and to privatize Social Security. In fact,
Bush does not even address the long-term costs of these two huge deficit
drivers in his budget, or factor in costs of future operations in Iraq
and Afghanistan, estimated to be at least $80 billion this year alone.
Real truth in budgeting and genuine concerns for
fiscal stewardship would demand forthrightness absent from the Bush
budget. A budget that leveled with the American people would tell them
that:
First, President Bush's tax cuts are the single
greatest reason for the nation's spiraling budget deficits. According to
Congressional Budget Office data, the Bush tax cuts account for nearly
half of the increase in the nation's deficit since 2001. The tax cuts'
share of the deficit is three times larger than the share caused by new
spending on domestic programs. Making these tax cuts permanent, as Bush
proposes, will add $10 trillion to the deficit over 20 years.
Unlike the budget cuts Bush now wants, which fall
heavily on low- and moderate-income Americans, the budget-busting tax
cuts Bush has pushed through overwhelmingly benefit the nation's
richest. In 2004, 60 percent of the benefit from the Bush tax cuts went
to the 20 percent of households with average annual incomes exceeding
$200,000.
Second, although Congress should address Social
Security's funding problems, Bush's answer—privatizing Social
Security—is a radical approach that will gut Americans' retirement
security and cost the nation a bundle. Privatizing Social Security would
require cuts in guaranteed benefits for all future retirees. Equally
troubling for the nation's fiscal health, setting up private investment
accounts would explode the deficit. Privatizing Social Security would
add nearly $5 trillion in new national debt over the first 20 years the
system is in effect, putting us deeper in hock to such foreign
governments as China and Japan. Moreover, although President Bush claims
privatizing Social Security would not affect workers or retirees older
than 55, the budgetary strains resulting from privatization would create
enormous pressure to raise taxes or cut spending—including spending on
benefits for today's older workers and retirees.
The bottom line on President Bush's budget is that it punishes America's
workers and their families for the president's own misdeeds—his
stubborn insistence on preserving and expanding tax breaks that mostly
benefit the very wealthy. The budget most hurts America's working
families who can least afford cuts in programs we all rely on in order
to preserve extravagant tax breaks for the wealthiest among us. And
instead of putting the nation back on surer fiscal footing, Bush's
budget policies and priorities will worsen the nation's financial
situation.
We hope Congress has the courage and decency to reject
the president's shameful attempt to pass the buck for budget problems to
America's families and will instead place the blame and fix the solution
squarely where it belongs—on the president's tax cuts. It is dishonest
to blame budget problems on programs that serve all Americans when their
greatest source is tax cuts that benefit relatively few. It is
fundamentally wrong to balance the federal budget on the backs of
children, retirees, the poor and people with disabilities in order to
save tax breaks for millionaires.
|